Trusting Voice Recognition and the EHR

This is a great article that speaks to the errors that can occur with Speech Recognition and EHR if proper editing and care are not taken for review.   The end of the article even speaks to the growing demand for Medical Scribes, so be sure to read the complete article.  You won’t be sorry!

EHR-documentation

It isn’t often that a doctor is mistaken about how many feet his patient has.

But that’s the mistake this young doctor made by relying too heavily on an erroneous electronic medical record. According to Dr. Richard Gunderman:

An intern recently presented a newly admitted patient on morning rounds, reporting that the patient was “status post BKA (below the knee amputation).” “How do you know?” the attending physician inquired. “It has been noted on each of the patient’s prior three discharge notes,” replied the intern, looking up from his computer screen. “Okay,” responded the attending physician. “Let’s go see the patient.”

When the team arrived in the patient’s room, they made a surprising discovery. The patient had two feet and ten toes. Where did the history of BKA come from? It turned out that four hospitalizations ago, the voice recognition dictation system had misunderstood DKA (diabetic ketoacidosis) as BKA, and none of the physicians who reviewed the chart had detected the error. It had now become a permanent part of the electronic medical record — as if written in stone.

Fortunately, this error could be easily corrected. But the intern’s mistake highlights a growing problem with government-mandated electronic medical records. Doctors are spending more time in front of computer screens and less time with actual patients. This affects how doctors interact with patients. Inevitably, errors creep into their patients’ charts. Prudent patients should be aware of this trend and take steps to ensure the accuracy of their medical records.

The HITECH (Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health) Act of 2009 essentially mandates that physicians and hospitals adopt electronic records by 2014, or face penalties in the form of reduced Medicare/Medicaid payments.

At first glance, adopting electronic medical records (EMRs) would seem a no-brainer for doctors and hospitals. After all, electronic records are the norm for many successful businesses, assisting with sales, inventory, and billing. In theory, electronic medical records should allow doctors to work more efficiently. But in practice, many doctors are finding that EMRs hinder their ability to practice good medicine.

recent study from Northwestern University found that, “physicians with [EMRs] in their exam rooms spend one-third of their time looking at computer screens, compared with physicians who use paper charts who only spent about 9% of their time looking at them.” According to Enid Montague, PhD, first author of the study, “When doctors spend that much time looking at the computer, it can be difficult for patients to get their attention… It’s likely that the ability to listen, problem-solve and think creatively is not optimal when physicians’ eyes are glued to the screen.”

New York Times health writer Dr. Pauline Chen similarly described that young doctors in training are so busy filling out obligatory electronic forms, they spend only 8 minutes per patient each day. As a result, they cut corners:

When finally in a room with patients, they try to [rush through interviews] by limiting or eliminating altogether gestures like sitting down to talk, posing open-ended questions, encouraging family discussions or even fully introducing themselves.

As Dr. Chen noted, the bad habits they learn in training will carry over to when they become independent practitioners.

(Some doctors are coping with this problem by hiring “scribes” — additional clerical people to enter data into the computer, while the physician converses with the patient. But this requires physicians or hospitals to hire additional personnel. As the New York Times noted, “In most industries, automation leads to increased efficiency, even employee layoffs. In health care, it seems, the computer has created the need for an extra human in the exam room.” The “solution” of scribes doesn’t eliminate the inefficiency caused by electronic medical records — it merely shifts the problem elsewhere.)

Medical Document Services of Kansas, LLC (MDS) is a Wichita, Kansas healthcare document service specializing in Medical Transcription, Revenue Cycle Management, AzaleaHealth EHR, and REAL-TIME solutions with Medical Scribes.   We provide efficient, accurate, affordable quality services for hospitals, clinics, and facilities of all sizes. Call 866-777-7264 today, or visit our website for more information.  We have education programs in Medical Scribe Specialists and Healthcare Documentation Specialists.

2013 Reflections

MDS reflects on the many blessings of 2013.  We have great appreciation for our customers, new and old, our friends, our business alliances and partners, and most of all … our incredible MDS team!  We are confident in what 2014 brings and wish good health, happiness and true peace for all!

AHDI reflects on most read healthcare articles for 2013.  Take a look …

UPMC transcriptionists protest after outsourcing
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
From Nov. 6: Cindy Cromie was a medical transcriptionist working for UPMC Hamot in Erie, Pa., when she, like the rest of the 130 people who provided medical transcriptions for the hospital system, got a call this spring to come to a meeting in Pittsburgh. They gathered in the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic of UPMC, where they were told that their work was being outsourced to Nuance Communications of Burlington, Mass.

Share this article:

Job changes coming for transcriptionists
Healthcare IT News
From July 17: Nearly 90 percent of medical transcriptionists say that transitioning to documentation roles with electronic health records means that gaps in skills need to be identified and new career paths charted, according to new a study. New speech and language processing technologies have set the stage for a fundamental transformation in the way transcriptionists work, according to the survey – conducted by the American Health Information Management Association and the Association for Healthcare Documentation Integrity — which found that 87 percent of respondents are preparing for new ways of doing things.

Share this article:

AMA: EHRs create ‘appalling Catch-22’
HealthcareIT News
From May 8: As the healthcare industry moves to EHRs, the medical record has essentially been reduced to a tool for billing, compliance and litigation that also has a sustained negative impact on doctors’ productivity, according to Steven J. Stack, M.D., chair of the American Medical Association’s board of trustees. “Documenting a full clinical encounter in an EHR is pure torment,” Stack said during the CMS Listening Session: Billing and Coding with Electronic Health Records.

Share this article:

dreamstime_l_2750869

Speech recognition software: Does it help or hinder care workflow?

FierceHealthIT
From Nov. 20: Does front-end speech recognition make for a smooth-running operation, or does it simply complicate documentation and patient care? Doctors and researchers debate this question in the November 2013 issue of health information management magazine For the Record. Gary David, Ph.D., an associate professor of sociology at Bentley University in Waltham, Mass., notes in the article that front-end speech recognition does not always save labor, but it does change workflow.

Share this article:

Scribes can be beneficial in medical practices
HealthDay News via Doctors Lounge
From Oct. 23: Medical scribes can accurately document physician or independent practitioner dictation and activities, allowing providers to spend more time with patients, according to an article published in Medical Economics. Maxine Lewis, president of Medical Coding & Reimbursement in Cincinnati, discusses the role of scribes in medical practices.

Share this article:

EHR copy and paste? Better think twice
Healthcare IT News
From Oct. 9: Who would have thought that something so simple as copy and paste could have such serious consequences? Speaking at the MGMA annual conference in San Diego, Diana Warner, director at AHIMA, confirmed the seriousness of inappropriately using copy and paste functions in electronic health records. And the government agrees — it’s no laughing matter.

Share this article:

Digital health records’ risks emerge as deaths blamed on systems
Bloomberg
From June 26: Electronic health records are supposed to improve medical care by providing physicians quick and easy access to a patient’s history, prescriptions, lab results and other vital data. While the new computerized systems have decreased some kinds of errors, such as those caused by doctors’ illegible prescriptions, the shift away from paper has also created new problems, with sometimes dire consequences.

Share this article:

Medical scribes boost EHR productivity, streamline workflow
EHR Intelligence
From Sept 25: While EHRs are sold to physicians as a way to increase quality while making documentation more efficient, few providers have seen as much return on that promise as they could like. EHRs can be time consuming to use on a daily basis, and patient interaction can suffer when being forced to peer at a computer screen during consult after consult. The solution, according to one cardiology practice, is to let a professional typist do the typing, and allow the physician to use his skills where they do the most good.

Share this article:

Updated HIPAA rules posing challenges for healthcare providers
The Wall Street Journal via iHealthBeat
From May 8: Health care providers say they likely will face challenges complying with new rules that expand and update HIPAA provisions. One of the biggest challenges under the new HIPAA rules is a provision allowing patients to request that insurers not be informed of treatments that patients paid for themselves.

Share this article:

Speech recognition: A work in progress
For The Record
From May 1: While controversy remains within the healthcare community regarding the best approach to using speech recognition technology, there are some points that most industry professionals agree on. Few would dispute that the vendor community has made tremendous strides to advance applications to better meet the needs of the healthcare industry, and innovation continues as developers look for ways to make the technology more intelligent and accurate.

Share this article:

 

Medical Document Services of Kansas, LLC (MDS) is a Wichita, Kansas healthcare document service specializing in Medical Transcription, Revenue Cycle Management, AzaleaHealth EHR, and REAL-TIME solutions.   We provide efficient, accurate, affordable quality services for hospitals, clinics, and facilities of all sizes. Call 866-777-7264 today, or visit our website for more information.

 

“Transcription versus EMR/EHR” – The Perfect Solution

By Andy Braverman, President of Apptec Corporation… a developer of next generation speech processing products.

“The way to do it right, is for the doctor to dictate just as they have for decades.
Dictation is the most efficient use of the doctor’s time. The EMR/EHR should only be in front of the
doctor to review a patient’s records… not to input data into it. For data input into the EMR/EHR, that
should be a “back office” task performed by the transcriptionist.”    READ MORE